Compared with DeleteMe and Incogni
Including where they are ahead. Prices checked 2026-08-25 from their own pages.
| DeleteMe | Incogni | Cartograph | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price a year | $129 | $96 | $99.99 |
| Data brokers | 92 entries | 420 | 398 free via the state, plus 99 we file |
| Professional profile sites | no | no | yes |
| What the AI models say | no | no | yes |
| Breach and infostealer exposure | monitoring | no | yes, with what to do |
| Proof the answer changed | a status list | a status list | same questions, before and after |
| Publish a correction | no | no | yes |
| Names what it cannot do | no | no | yes, four of them |
| Human review of hard cases | yes | no | not yet |
| Years of operation | since 2011 | since 2022 | new |
One at a time
Each of these is the same comparison against one service, with its price read from its own pricing page on 2026-08-27.
Why the broker count is the wrong number to compare
Since 1 August 2026 California runs its own deletion platform. One authenticated request, and every registered data broker must check it every 45 days, act within 90, and keep you off their list afterwards. That last part matters: a private company cannot force a broker to stop re-adding you, and the state can.
398 of the 503 sources we track are covered by it. If you live in California, that is most of what these services sell, available free and enforced better than any of us can manage. We file it for you and charge nothing for it, then work on what it does not reach.
Where they are better
- DeleteMe has people. A human reads the difficult cases and pushes back when a broker stalls. We do not have that yet, and for a genuinely hostile listing it is worth something.
- Both have years of history. They have seen brokers change their forms, disappear and come back. We are new, and our source list is honest about which entries have been checked against the live site and which have not.
- Incogni is cheap and simple. If all you want is the classic broker list and you are not in California, it does that.
Where we are different
They work a list of people-search sites. We started from the other end: we asked the AI models what they say about a real person, and followed every page they cited. Those pages were profile aggregators, not people-search sites, and not one of them appears on a competitor's list.
That is also why we can show you whether anything changed. The same questions, the same models, before and after. Everyone else can show you a list of emails they sent.
If anything here is out of date or wrong, write to support@usecartograph.com and we will correct it. Getting a competitor's facts wrong would be a strange way to run a company about accuracy.